top of page
Writer's pictureJames Ross

Digital Assets and the Law: Clearing the Fog Around Cross-Border Disputes

The world of digital assets is expanding rapidly, but legal clarity has sometimes kept pace. This is a significant concern for financial institutions navigating the complexities of cross-border transactions and potential disputes. Thankfully, a new paper by the Financial Markets Law Committee (FMLC) sheds light on this critical issue.




The Problem: Who's in Charge?


Imagine a digital asset transaction gone wrong, spanning multiple countries. Whose laws apply? Which court has jurisdiction? This legal uncertainty creates risk and can deter investment. It's a headache for financial firms that need predictable rules to operate effectively.


The FMLC's Solution: A Roadmap for Clarity

The FMLC proposes two fundamental solutions to this problem:

  1. A New Statutory Rule: This rule would prioritise the legal system chosen by the parties in their contract or specified within the digital asset itself. If no choice is made, a precise "waterfall" mechanism would determine the applicable law based on other factors.

  2. A Jurisdictional Gateway would grant English and Welsh courts jurisdiction over certain digital asset disputes, especially if the governing law is English or Welsh or the parties specifically choose those courts.


What This Means for Your Firm

  • Less Risk, More Confidence: Clearer rules mean less legal risk, boosting investor confidence and encouraging participation in digital asset markets.

  • Greater Control: Firms can proactively choose the laws that govern their digital asset transactions, adding a layer of predictability to their operations.

  • Streamlined Dispute Resolution: Knowing which court has jurisdiction simplifies resolving disputes, potentially saving time and money.

  • Global Implications: The FMLC's proposals could influence legal developments in other jurisdictions, potentially leading to a more harmonised global framework for digital assets.


Important Considerations

  • Focus on Financial Markets: These proposals address proprietary disputes within financial markets, not broader issues like consumer contracts or intellectual property.

  • UK-Specific: The FMLC's recommendations apply to England and Wales, with some potential differences in how Scottish law treats digital assets as property.

  • International Cooperation: For true global legal certainty, international cooperation and agreement on a standard approach are still essential.


Staying Ahead of the Curve

While these proposals are not yet law, they represent a significant step toward legal clarity for digital assets. Financial firms should stay informed about these developments, as they could reshape how cross-border transactions are structured and how disputes are resolved. By understanding and preparing for these potential changes, your firm can position itself to take advantage of the growing opportunities in the digital asset space.

Sign up to be notified about the latest updates of what we think

The posts listed on the 'What we think' webpages are our interpretation of regulatory developments we have been reading about. They should not be considered legal, regulatory or other advice. Contact us if you want to understand the impact of public policy, regulation and governance changes for you.

bottom of page